Tuesday, June 23, 2015

Post 14: Injecting a Steampunk Flavor into the mix...

    I am as you may know "into Steampunk", and have an ongoing Steampunk Project. I have studied early balloons, dirigeables, airships, steamships and submarines at length, including Monturiol's 1850 beautiful wooden Ictineo .
   So I wouldn't mind introducing a "Steampunk flavor" to the whole thing, with wheels, spring motors, clocks, period vehicles. After all , the first steam powered vehicle, Cugnot's clumsy "Fardier" was built in 1769:


and Trevithick's wonderfully whimsical and fanciful London Steam Carriage was built in 1803:



   One could imagine such a contraption would have made it to the court. After all, the King was known to be a keen locksmith, and more interested in mechanics than in economics or politics.
   Steamboats were also experimental at the time, and we could conceive of one gracing the "Pièce d'Eau" together with rowboats and sailboats... Actually, the very first steam-powered ship "Pyroscaphe" was built in France in 1783 by the Marquis Claude de Jouffroy and his colleagues as an improvement of an earlier attempt, the 1776 Palmipède. I was a paddle steamer powered by a Newcomen steam engine, and we know what it looked like, as there is a model in the Maritime Museum in Paris:



   Also, the American engineer Robert Fulton, then living in Paris, designed the first working submarine, the "Nautilus" between 1793 and 1797, while living in France. It's design is even more whimsical than that of the London Steam Carriage:



    He asked the French Government to subsidize its construction but he was turned down twice. Eventually he approached the Minister of Marine himself and in 1800 was granted permission to build. The shipyard Perrier in Rouen built it and it sailed first in July 1800 on the Seine River in the same city.  When tested his submarine went underwater for 17 minutes in 25 feet of water, an amazing feat. 
    Just fantasizing guys!

Post 13: Another Side Trip, this Time Through Paper Doll History

   One thing tends to lead to another when I start brainstorming, and the playing card research led to another king of paper product that started to be created in the early 19th Century, about the time Cherubini was making landscapes cutting up playing cards.
   Even though I am working on a Light Show, everything here is revolving around paper it seems: the written music itself, going from Cherubini's manuscript to published printed score


the prints from the period that I have collected and gathered to tell the story in images



the documents and manuscripts by Royal hands



 the portraits of French kings and queens:



the playing cards I started designing



 and now the incredible wealth of paper dolls inspired by Marie Antoinette, to this day. There are delightful 19th Century plates:





old advertisement paper dolls



whole books , cutout figures and  sets of clothes still being designed by Artists



 especially the almost three dimensional collection of whimsical scenes by Rhonda Knauf on Etsy:



     These really got me thinking theatre, with the two sided design, the accessories, the spring winding key, the wheels(I love wheels). I then ran across these two jointed paper dolls:


and started brainstorming about a 2D animation sequence with paper sets.
  A while back, I got interested and researched old children toy theaters:
 and some of their contemporary re interpretations:

   I can envision building one of these in 3D in After Effect, cutting the paper dolls into parts, adding wheels, sets based on Versailles, and coming up with a sequence technically similar to the dancing écorché's "Danse Macabre" sequence in my Light Dreams Show:


   Except that the puppets would be Louis XVI, Marie Antoinette, the Princess of Lamballe, and other "courtisans", and the sets would be the Hall of Mirrors, the Gardens, the Lake, the Trianon, the Farm, any part of Versailles I could rebuild as a 3D stage:



Saturday, June 20, 2015

Post 12: A Side Trip to Playing Cards History

    How this came about, I don't remember exactly... Something to do with Marie Antoinette's taste for games, and games that people played in the 18th Century. Also, there is this little teasing tidbit of information about Cherubini being so dejected and depressed around 1807-1808 that he stayed home cutting up playing cards and assembling them into landscapes. I could not find any corroboration or any images of the landscapes in question anywhere else:
     "Disappointed and discouraged by lack of recognition, Cherubini produced scarcely anything in the two years which followed. He was broken-hearted and in ill health.He divided his time between drawing, botany, and cutting up playing cards into figures and landscapes which he framed and placed on the walls around his study. Not until 1809 was he aroused from this morbid indolence". 
   Still, it is an interesting visual proposition, so I looked for and found a bridge deck of French Royalty Playing cards. 



  They are not bad, but really a bit too traditional for my taste. Platnik Austrian cards...
  So I suddenly found myself designing my own deck of Royal Playing Cards in Photoshop... Things are still very fluid, but just to give you an idea, here is what I have so far: 
Louis XVI
 and Marie Antoinette

                  Louis XVIII

and Marie Josephine de Savoie

Henri IV
                                             and Marie de Medicis
                                                      Francois Premier

  I also have a few variations  for the backs of the decks, using a border from  Masonic Board, and old prints from the period:







 I don't know yet how I will use them in the show, but have no doubt they will find their place. The projection is a huge  5760 x 1080 pixels, so I am designing the cards 3000 x 2000 pixels, which is about as large as possible with material found on the Internet. 

Saturday, June 13, 2015

Post 11: What is Carlos' Requiem Interpretation be like?

   It is going to be a serious problem for me working on the images until I have a reasonable approximation of what Carlos' final interpretation will be. I can allow for a certain amount of adjustment by breaking up the video in clips that are cued precisely to the final performance at dramatic musical moments. But that has to be within reason.
  When I was originally approached by Pierre about the Project, I wasn't familiar with this particular Requiem and went straight to iTunes to find the music. I found a number of different versions, and clicked my way through most of them listening to snippets until I figured out which one I LIKED. That happened to be Matthew Best and the Corydon Singer. But there are a lot of other versions out there.
  I actually went back to look yesterday, and found 16 recordings +, going back to Toscanini's in 1928:



  There also seem to be some variations on exactly how the Requiem is broken up in performance. The score I have, which is old, has 7 parts:
   INTROIT, GRADUEL, DIES IRAE, OFFERTOIRE, SANCTUS, PIE JESU, AGNUS DEI.  
   In the version I am listening to, Matthew Best breaks things up in 8 parts:
     INTROIT AND KYRIE, GRADUATE, DIES IRAE, OFFERTORIUM:DOMINE JESU CHRISTE, OFFERTORIUM: HOSTIAS, SANCTUS, PIE JESU, AGNUS DEI.
   Martin Perlman does the same thing with the Boston Baroque.
  On the other hand, Carlo Maria Giulini does it another way, grouping sections to make only 5 parts:
 INTROIT, GRADUEL DIES IRAE, OFFERTOIRE, SNCTUS PIE JESU, AGNUS DEI
    Toscanini stuck with the original 7 parts score, and so does Ricardo Mutti.
   All this is a little confusing, and I need to know what Carlos is going to do, and what version out there is closest to what his interpretation will be, so I have a sound track to set images to that is reasonably close to the final ASO performance.

Wednesday, June 10, 2015

Post 10: Setting up my Studio Workspace

   As I explained earlier, I want to recreate as closely a possible in the studio the situation in the Concert hall, mainly in order to get a good idea of how things will look like in the dark on the three big screen, and rehearse the performance. It will also allow me to show Pierre, Carlos, and other people at the Symphony what I have in store for them, and get their approval for my material.
 I have received the two new Mitsubishi Projectors and the Matrox box. I have set up the 3 projectors on tripods on top of my desk, and have hung the piece of Spandex high up in front of my computer:


 But I have been struggling to get things going, and the computer was going crazy when I plugged in the 3 projectors. So I plugged instead in 3 old 1920 x 1080 monitors into the Matrox Box, and plugged the Matrox into the computer's Graphic Card second DVI output and a USB plug for power. I went ahead and reinstalled the drivers, and did a firmware update.
Things now seem to work properly, and I have a desktop stretching across the 3 monitors:



Sunday, June 7, 2015

Post 9: Concert at Railroad Park Friday Night

   After watching Carlos shape the music and work with the musicians at rehearsal on Tuesday, I was particularly interesting in seing the final performance at Railroad Park at 8 on Friday night.
   Rachel and I drove down early to get a parking space, and Michael helped us haul and set up our folding chairs, cooler and picnic on the grassy knoll, way too far from the tent. I could not hear a thing, and quickly moved my chair first row center, which happened to be unoccupied, as actually were all the front rows...I suppose people were afraid to get too close. 
   Anyway, once up close, the sound was fine, and I could see the musicians play and Carlos conduct very well. Mind you, a Symphony Orchestra is not the ideal kind of orchestra for outdoors, even with a stack of rather ineffective speakers. Trains going by a few feet away are a noisy distraction, as are helicopters flying directly overhead. But I knew the music and had heard it in rehearsal, so I did enjoy the evening.


  The weather was great, the sky a deep turquoise, with Venus rising above the tent(OK ,I enhanced it a little!) 

Post 8: First Creative Meeting

    Everybody came to my house early Thursday as planned, and we sat in the living room with a glass of wine, first to get to know Carlos better, and second to start to figure out what his vision was for that Requiem Projection, and the future of things at ASO in general.
  Most importantly, I got to ask the question that had been on my mind and was really my biggest concern: how are we going we keep the images and the music in synch over the course of a 5 minutes movement. I had already decided to start a new video with each movement, but that is not enough.
  Preuit and I had tried to come up with ways to do that, with advice from one of his old LA Symphony friends. Would Carlos consider using some kind of click track, or at least give us a basic music track, or would he be willing to follow visual cues to help keep the music in synch with the images.
  The answer to all those was a very nice no, which I expected after watching him conduct rehearsals, and actually totally understand. He wants to retain the option to "go with the inspiration" (my words), and adjust the tempo at will at any moment of each performance, depending on the genius of a particular soloist that day, or simply his mood or that of the audience.
   That puts the ball totally in my corner when it comes to having a particular visual effect exactly synchronized with a particular sound in the performance. I will need to know the score perfectly, and be able to anticipate every key moment. I wish I could read music... Pierre said somebody would help me.
  In simple words, there will be no continuous video set to an approximate music track,not even on per movement, but rather dozens of short video snippets that will need to be manually cued and launched exactly at the correct instant preceding a key sound,  drum roll, trumpet call, crescendo, etc... That is a totally new way to work for me, and  more akin to a live performance than my previous efforts. A bit like VJing, but with video clips instead of loops, and with utmost precision. Scary indeed. The BAD THING is that if I miss a cue, there is no going back. The GOOD THING is that if I miss a cue, I can still get the next one right!
   If Resolume Avenue VJ Software was able to handle multiple layers of full HD loops without skipping, that would be an option, but I don't think it can. At least, my current version won't. I just install the new version and will see if it works better
   I will also look into using QLab and Isadora, both of which can cue video on the touch of a key, or with a MIDI input.